Novel case of diabetic myonecrosis in a teenage patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus

  1. Jasmina Solankee 1,
  2. Timothy Zaki 2,
  3. Emily Hoff 2 and
  4. Shweta Chowdhury 3
  1. 1 Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  3. 3 Division of Hospitalist Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jasmina Solankee; jasmina.solankee@utsouthwestern.edu

Publication history

Accepted:10 Feb 2022
First published:02 Mar 2022
Online issue publication:02 Mar 2022

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Diabetic myonecrosis is a rare complication of diabetes that is typically described in patients with long-standing, uncontrolled diabetes. We report a case in which diabetic myonecrosis presents as an early complication of diabetes. To our knowledge, this is the first report of diabetic myonecrosis observed in an adolescent patient with type 2 diabetes. A 16-year-old girl presented with acute-onset, bilateral lower extremity pain and tenderness concerning for bilateral gastrocnemius myonecrosis in the setting of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes for at least 4–5 years. Investigations revealed elevated creatine kinase levels and MRI suggestive of myonecrosis. A left gastrocnemius muscle biopsy had histological findings consistent with active myofibre necrosis and multifocal perivascular lymphocytic infiltration consistent with diabetic myonecrosis. The patient’s symptoms improved after 11 days of treatment with intravenous fluids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glycaemic control and physical therapy.

Background

Diabetic myonecrosis is characterised by acute pain and swelling of skeletal muscles, most often in the lower extremities. It is a rare complication of long-standing or poorly controlled diabetes and is typically associated with other microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes.1 Although the acute presentation is self-limiting, long-term prognosis in diabetic patients with myonecrosis is poor, with a reported majority of patients dying within 5 years.2

On review of the current literature, the presence of diabetic myonecrosis in younger patient populations has not been well reported. The youngest ages at which an episode of diabetic myonecrosis has been reported was found to be in 19-year-old and 20-year-old women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).3 4 We report a case of bilateral diabetic myonecrosis in a 16-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and no known prior microangiopathic complications of the disease. To our knowledge, this is the first report of diabetic myonecrosis observed in an adolescent patient with T2DM.

This case demonstrates that myonecrosis can present as an early complication of poorly controlled diabetes and is an important finding as the prevalence of T2DM in adolescent populations continues to increase.5 6 This case also highlights the importance of achieving optimal glycaemic control in younger diabetic populations.

Case presentation

A 16-year-old girl presented with 1 day of severe bilateral calf pain and tenderness. Her medical history was notable for T2DM since the age of 11–12 years, obesity (body mass index 41.8 kg/m2), depression, anxiety, bipolar-type schizo-affective disorder and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Notably, the patient’s mother has poorly controlled diabetes with microvascular and macrovascular complications.

The patient presented with sudden-onset, bilateral calf pain that began after a 5-hour road trip, the day prior to admission. Her severe calf pain was described as constant and stabbing. The pain worsened with movement, limiting ambulation. Her medications included insulin degludec, metformin, olanzapine, ziprasidone, buspirone, escitalopram, lamotrigine, famotidine and cetirizine. There was no history of trauma or a fall.

On initial physical examination, the patient was afebrile with stable vital signs. On examination, there was no apparent erythema or induration. Her bilateral gastrocnemius muscles were exquisitely tender and firm to palpation. The patient’s sensation was intact to light touch, vibration, proprioception and temperature in all fields, with intact ankle reflexes. Neurovascular examination was intact with strong dorsalis pedis and tibialis posterior pulses. Homan’s sign for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was negative.

Investigations

Initial laboratory studies were notable for an elevated creatine kinase (CK) of 2420 U/L (Ref: 26–192 U/L) and C reactive protein of 8.5 mg/L (Ref: ≤5.0 mg/L). Suboptimal glycaemic control was confirmed with a haemoglobin A1c of 10.2% (Ref: 4.3%–5.6%). The remainder of laboratory studies at admission is as follows: glucose 148 (Ref: 60–100 mg/dL), calcium 9.4 (Ref: 8.4–10.2 mg/dL), magnesium 2.1 (Ref: 1.6–2.6 mg/dL), creatinine 0.67 (Ref: 0.57–1.11 mg/dL), aspartate aminotransferase 50 (Ref: 10–35 U/L) and alanine aminotransferase 25 (Ref: 10–35 U/L).

An ultrasound imaging was negative for DVT. The patient’s CK continued to rise, peaking at 4362 U/L (Ref: 26–192 U/L) and normalised after 1 week. A CT imaging of the lower extremities revealed muscle oedema, consistent with myositis. Subsequent MRI of the lower extremities showed multiple areas of patchy oedema and bilateral enhancement of the medial gastrocnemius heads, suggestive of myonecrosis (figure 1). Autoimmune labs and myositis panels including antinuclear, anti-Sjogren’s syndrome A, anti-Sjogren’s syndrome B, anti-Smith, anti-ribonucleoprotein, anti-topoisomerase I, anti-histidyl transfer RNA synthetase and anti-signal recognition particle antibodies were unremarkable.

Figure 1

MRI tibia/fibula: T2 fat-saturated imaging with contrast reveals multiple areas of patchy oedema and enhancement in the bilateral medial heads of the gastrocnemius muscles. These enhancements are more prominent in the left lower extremity.

Histological examination of a left gastrocnemius muscle biopsy revealed acutely necrotic myofibres and phagocytosis of the necrotic cells (figures 2 and 3) consistent with a diagnosis of diabetic myonecrosis.4 7 Immunostains were obtained due to the presence of perivascular and interstitial mononuclear infiltrate. A majority of these cells were positive for CD3, indicative of a T-cell dominant lymphocytic inflammatory process with no evidence of Major Histocompatibility Complex I upregulation.

Figure 2

H&E 10×: H&E of cryostat section showing cross sections of myofibres, some of them undergoing myonecrosis with myophagocytosis and perivascular mononuclear cells infiltrate.

Figure 3

Esterase: stain highlights macrophages and atrophic/degenerating myofibres, some of them undergoing phagocytosis.

Differential diagnosis

Given the patient’s age, clinical presentation and lack of known microvascular complications of diabetes, multiple diagnoses were considered. Imaging suggestive of myositis and an unusually young age for the development of diabetic myonecrosis warranted further laboratory studies. Table 1 shows the list of diagnoses considered, their clinical presentation and additional features.

Table 1

Differential diagnosis for acute muscle swelling and pain in an extremity

Disease Clinical characteristics Additional features
Diabetic myonecrosis Acute swelling and tenderness in unilateral/bilateral muscles Associated with poor glycaemic control, other complications of diabetes, elevated creatine kinase (CK)
Acute/emergent
Deep venous thrombosis Acute or chronic; swelling and tenderness of muscle in an extremity Ultrasound reveals a clot in deep veins; history of prolonged immobilisation or hypercoagulability
Compartment syndrome Acute swelling and tenderness of muscle, pain on passive dorsiflexion, loss of peripheral pulses, paraesthesia and crepitus Often develops after significant trauma; surgical emergency requiring fasciotomy to fully decompress all involved compartments
Rhabdomyolysis Acute swelling and tenderness of muscle, overlying erythema and/or induration, fever Myoglobinuria, elevated CK
Autoimmune
Dermatomyositis/polymyositis Subacute proximal > distal weakness; dermatomyositis is associated with skin changes Associated with anti-histidyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies
Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy Subacute proximal extremity weakness Associated with anti-signal recognition particle antibodies, elevated CK
Drug-induced/toxic
Olanzapine/ziprasidone-associated myopathy Acute to subacute muscle weakness, myalgia Elevated CK; history of toxic ingestion; resolves with cessation of causative agent
Infectious
Cellulitis Acute swelling and tenderness of superficial skin, overlying erythema and/or induration, fever Elevated inflammatory markers, leucocytosis
Necrotising fasciitis Acute progressive swelling and tenderness of subcutaneous tissue, overlying erythema and warmth, fever, skin changes/rash, crepitus Elevated inflammatory markers, leucocytosis

Treatment

While awaiting biopsy results, therapeutic management was started with intravenous fluids, given her elevated CK, and low-dose aspirin (81 mg) daily. On the 5th day of admission, aspirin was temporarily replaced with naproxen 550 mg two times per day in the setting of persistent pain limiting participation with physical therapy (PT), scheduled four times a week. On the 9th day of admission, given improvement in pain, naproxen was discontinued, and the patient was restarted on low-dose aspirin (81 mg) daily until her pain resolved. During admission, the patient’s olanzapine and ziprasidone were initially held due to concern for medication-induced myopathy. Subsequently, ziprasidone was restarted for the patient’s schizo-affective disorder after a discussion of risks and benefits with psychiatry. The patient received a total of 11 days of treatment in the hospital and was discharged on low-dose aspirin until follow-up with an outpatient doctor.

Prior to admission, the patient was reportedly taking 70 units of insulin degludec once daily and 500 mg of metformin two times per day. While admitted, the patient’s metformin was held, and she was started on insulin glargine and insulin aspart for basal-bolus coverage. The units of her basal-bolus regimen while admitted were adjusted as needed to improve overall glycaemic control, with a goal of maintaining glucose levels between 140 and 180 mg/dL (Ref: 60–100 mg/dL). The patient was discharged on 1000 mg of metformin two times per day and 70 total daily units of 70:30 insulin isophane/insulin regular. She also received education from nutritionists and diabetes educators regarding lifestyle modifications during her hospitalisation.

Outcome and follow-up

During admission, the patient progressed well with treatment. Initially, severe pain limited her ability to participate in PT. With adequate pain control, the patient continued to work with PT and regained functional mobility. Initially she required a rolling walker, however, by the time of discharge, did not require any assistance with ambulation. The patient’s CK had normalised to 149 (Ref: 26–192 U/L) during the course of her admission and the patient’s blood glucose on the 2 days prior to discharge ranged from 89 to 168 mg/dL (Ref: 60–100 mg/dL). Due to changes in social circumstances, the patient moved out of the area and was lost to follow-up. The current health status of the patient presented in this case is unknown.

Discussion

Diabetic myonecrosis is a rare complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. When present, it is most often associated with long-standing, poorly controlled diabetes and accompanying microvascular and macrovascular complications.1 4 To our knowledge, we present the youngest case of diabetic myonecrosis reported in the literature and the first case of diabetic myonecrosis in a teenage patient with T2DM.

At presentation, our patient was 16 years old and had known T2DM for 4–5 years. In comparison, a systematic review found that the average age of patients with reported myonecrosis was 52.2 (range 34–67) years in those with T2DM and the average duration of diabetes to be 18.9 years.4 Additionally, our patient had risk factors for diabetic complications including poor glycaemic control, family history, obesity and olanzapine, which is associated with increased T2DM in adolescents.8 As T2DM becomes more common in adolescent populations, diabetic myonecrosis may become more commonly encountered in clinical practice.

In the initial evaluation of our patient, it was important to include diabetic myonecrosis on our differential, despite its rarity and typical presentation at older ages. Our patient demonstrated the classic clinical presentation of diabetic myonecrosis seen in older populations: a sudden-onset, unilateral or bilateral muscular swelling and pain, with the anterior thighs and calves being the two most common locations, respectively.4 Her presentation was unusual as she did not report any pre-existing microvascular diabetic complications. Unfortunately, we were not able to entirely confirm the absence of these pre-existing complications as no information was available regarding prior retinal screening or urine albumin-creatinine ratio. Nevertheless, given the association of diabetic myonecrosis with other microvascular complications, her presentation served as a warning for improved glycaemic control and screening for other diabetic complications.

Given her age, her case presented a diagnostic dilemma as muscle biopsy offers a definitive diagnosis, but it is not generally recommended in diabetic myonecrosis due to delayed recovery and association with haematoma formation and infection.4 9 10 The diagnosis, thus, is typically made clinically and radiographically, with MRI being the radiographical test of choice.2 Characteristic MRI findings include intramuscular oedema and increased T2 intensity in comparison with normal skeletal muscle, indicative of muscle infarction and necrosis consistent with our case (figure 1).10 11 We ultimately decided to pursue a muscle biopsy due to her young age and the impact of her diagnosis on treatment and prognosis.

Management and treatment of diabetic myonecrosis consists mainly of rest, analgesia, PT and glycaemic control. Several reports suggest decreased average recovery for diabetic myonecrosis with antiplatelet or anti-inflammatory therapy (5.5 weeks) compared with bed rest and pain control alone (8 weeks).4 12 13 Additionally, patients who received anti-inflammatory therapy had decreased risk of recurrence compared with those treated with supportive measures.4 Because of this, patients are typically started on low-dose aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the duration of their acute episode. However, no randomised trials have been done comparing specific agents with one another or whether patients benefit from continued anti-inflammatory therapy following the resolution of acute symptoms. Swift initiation of NSAIDs/aspirin, optimisation of pain management, young age and good functional status prior to admission likely contributed to our patient’s shorter recovery time and independent ambulation at discharge. The data on usage of PT is mixed as some studies suggest that patients receiving PT have delayed recovery from their acute presentation in comparison with those receiving medical management alone.1 4 For our patient, her functional status improved with PT. It is likely that patients benefit both from appropriate amounts of bed rest and physical activity as tolerated.

Finally, it was important to ensure that we equipped our patient with tools to improve glycaemic control at home to prevent future diabetic complications, especially in the setting of her young age. The short-term prognosis of diabetic myonecrosis is good, with most symptoms resolving in weeks to months.2 4 11 In our case, the patient’s pain and swelling had significantly improved by the time of discharge in 11 days. However, there is a 40%–50% risk of recurrence of myonecrosis. Review of the literature reveals mortality rates as high as 10% in 2 years, with many patients dying within 5 years.1 2 13 The cause of death in these cases is attributed to underlying end-organ vascular complications in most patients who present with myonecrosis. As the presence of diabetic myonecrosis in younger patient populations has not been well-reported, there is a lack of data exploring how outcomes of diabetic myonecrosis differ in comparison to older patients. For this patient, her myonecrosis served as an opportunity to discuss lifestyle changes and risk of future medical complications from her diabetes including recurrent episodes of myonecrosis.11 The patient was provided with counselling regarding her diagnosis and the importance of maintaining good glycaemic control and engaging in physical activity for weight loss. Additionally, the patient’s prior to admission prescription for olanzapine was discontinued to assist with suboptimal glycaemic control.

Diabetic myonecrosis may be overlooked, delaying interventions, specifically in younger populations as seen in this case. Although rare, the association with diabetic microvascular complications, poor prognosis and lack of evidence-based interventions for diabetic myonecrosis highlight the need for further research. As more young people develop diabetes, it is increasingly important to consider myonecrosis in clinical practice and maintain optimal glycaemic control in these populations.

Learning points

  • Diabetic myonecrosis is a rare complication of poorly controlled diabetes.

  • Diabetic myonecrosis can present in adolescents as an early complication of diabetes with suboptimal glycaemic control. This case highlights the importance of consideration of diabetic myonecrosis in young patients with poorly controlled diabetes who present with acute extremity pain.

  • Treatment of diabetic myonecrosis consists of rest and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but it serves as a warning for future diabetic complications with high rates of recurrence and mortality.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Acknowledgments

We would like to formally acknowledge the contributions of Dr Veena Rajaram, who provided high quality histology imaging, figure legends and reviewed the relevant pathology sections of the paper.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JS, TZ, EH and SC were on the primary team providing medical care for the patient. SC was the attending physician overseeing the team. JS, TZ and EH wrote and revised the paper. SC provided critical revisions to the content of the paper. We would also like to formally acknowledge the contributions of Dr Veena Rajaram, who provided high quality histology imaging, figure legends and reviewed the relevant pathology sections of the paper.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

  • Competing interests In May of 2021, JS presented a poster at an annual research symposium hosted by UT Southwestern Medical Center’s Department of Internal Medicine in Dallas, Texas. She received $100 to use towards educational or research project associated costs as part of the 2021 Clinical Vignette Award for the project titled 'Case Report: Diabetic Myonecrosis in a Pediatric Patient with Type 2 Diabetes'.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer